Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Connecticut Renegades

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 19:05, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Connecticut Renegades

• Delete subject lacks notability and no other NEMHL teams have own pages. RexRex84 23:24, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, the subject in fact has ntability from the league they're in. The league appears to be notable enough, so there's no problem with the NEHML teams having them, even if no one's made the articles yet. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems fine and notable. No problem if other teams start having articles about them. Madd4Max 20:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Ian Manka Talk to me! 16:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep as above. BoojiBoy 16:44, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete per RexRex84. Matt 23:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. From the wording of this article, the Renegades are merely a "candidate" for the league, not a "member" of the league. The link to the "official website" leads to an offer to sell the domain name. Agent 86 07:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, it's an amateur children's team. User:Angr 08:48, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Angr. This is the second not-proper-hockeycruft nom'd article I have seen lately which lacks context: Junior B, Midgets - WTF ? Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.