Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Confuzzled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:32, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Confuzzled

dicdef and unnecessary WCFrancis 18:03, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. I was jsut about to put this on AfD, but you got there first. DES ^(talk) 18:06, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Lord Voldemort ^{(Dark Mark)} 18:23, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• delete Neologism (and listed as such on the web). Groeck 18:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and move to Wiki Dictionary of Slang. Whoops! We don't have one. Oh, well... ♠ DanMS 00:37, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Yes we have. It's over there. And it already has a far better entry for confuzzled. Uncle G 07:02, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. Great word, though. TheMadBaron 02:35, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Wiktionary if verified. I seem to remember it being used in quite an area, but I can't really prove it. Otherwise delete as dic def. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:02, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Transwiki is not an option. See above. Uncle G 07:02, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.