Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Competence

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 18:04, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Competence

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The article is is essentially just a dictionary definition. A lot of the pages that link here are articles on legal topics. It might be sensible to make this into a disambiguation page, with links to (currently nonexistent) articles Legal competence and Competence (business). Bcrowell 00:01, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, expanded. The individual aspects could be broken out but as of now they are each one paragraph. Christopher Parham (talk) 02:16, 2005 August 20 (UTC)
• Keep per Christopher Parham. -- DS1953 03:40, August 20, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Parham is a truly competent editor. BorgQueen 15:59, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.