Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Community communications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was deleteDunc|☺ 19:29, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Community communications
Looks like an advertisement, certainly not NPOV. Delete page. IByte 4 July 2005 12:44 (UTC)
- Delete, advertisement, non-notable, POV rubbish. - Aaron Hill July 4, 2005 12:48 (UTC)
Definitely not an advertisement (?), but rather an synopsis of a quasi-religious organisation's beliefs. est and Church_of_Scientology have entries.
- Delete oh yes it is an ad: it's from here. However, I've not marked it as {{copyvio}} since that website includes no copyright notice. If someone who knows the rules reckons it can still be copyvio'd that'd be great. -Splash July 4, 2005 13:16 (UTC)
- Delete, mark copyvio. I don't believe a notice is required to establish copyright. No writer is acknowledged nor is there a PD notice, so it is therefore copyrighted, one way or another. I would mark the page as copyvio. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 13:22 (UTC)
- You're right, lack of copyright notice doesn't make it free to use (see Copyright#Copyright_notices).--Jyril July 4, 2005 19:54 (UTC)
- Delete, mark copyvio. I don't believe a notice is required to establish copyright. No writer is acknowledged nor is there a PD notice, so it is therefore copyrighted, one way or another. I would mark the page as copyvio. --Alex12 3 4 July 2005 13:22 (UTC)
- Comment: On a closer look at the page (which was still heavily expanded after the VfD) it appears that it was written by opponents of this cult-like organisation as a warning. However, I still think that the page is inappropriate for Wikipedia in its present form. --IByte 4 July 2005 14:01 (UTC)
- Delete Absolutely agree, this is inappropriate. Groeck 4 July 2005 16:04 (UTC)
- Delete as above.--Jyril July 4, 2005 19:54 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
