Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Communique Conferencing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete Proto||type 12:34, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Communique Conferencing
Even though this company gets over 600 ghits I don't think it is notable. If it was, it's unlikely that the anon editor they employ to linkspam the project would need to do so. Private company, no turnover, no employee data, no evidence of WP:CORP. And then there's the linkspamming. Just zis Guy you know? 14:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Non-notable. Advertisement. Article fails to assert notability. No third party is writing about or discussing this company. There is an industry white paper here [1], where they appear as one of about 150 conferencing service providers. There are many more recognizable names on the list. The report is from 2003. Slowmover 19:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:33, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Delete with prejudice, WP does not exist as a linkfarm. KillerChihuahua?!? 11:25, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- The page mentions WebEx. I can't live without that application. If this were the company that developed WebEx I think it would easily pass notability tests regardless of number of ghits. But it's not, from their site " Communiqué's partnership with WebEx™ offers best-of-breed Web conferencing solutions. Voted best Web conferencing solution by PC Magazine and with over 64% of the web conference market share, WebEx is unequaled for security, reliability and functionality. " So... delete ++Lar: t/c 16:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
