Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/College Board criticism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. While we should all be very open to the idea of merging if there's content to be saved, I agree with those who say there's no content here worth saving. fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 06:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] College Board criticism

attack piece —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Feinstein (talk • contribs) .

• Delete. Criticisms cite no sources. It sounds like someone has an axe to grind. TheMadBaron 07:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with College Board is possible else delete Ydam 08:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge the salvagable parts into College Board +Hexagon1 (talk) 08:39, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Delete as per above. Blatant attack and NPOV. -HubHikari 11:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the unsourced attack stub. --Flawiki 12:01, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge or delete. Having a separate article like this is not very neutral in POV.--Jusjih 18:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not merge. We do have criticisms of Microsoft but they're sourced, reasonably neutral in POV, and not rants. There's nothing here that's worth merging. Stifle (talk) 23:52, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Soley an attack. Bacmac 17:27, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, since this has survived speedy per A6 all this time. I strongly dislike the idea of merging: I see nothing salvageable in the contents as they stand - strong bias and rampant POVs. Phaedriel ♥ tell me - 15:46, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.