Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clownze
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 04:12, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Clownze
Probably nonsense. Almost no google and nothing relevent, but always happy to hear new information. brenneman(t)(c) 02:00, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - makey-uppy. Camillus (talk) 02:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete bollocks Ruby 02:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep i actually know a few people like this. didnt know they were called clownze. RubenSteve 02:15, 4 February 2006 (UTC-8)
- Nice one Steve, really fascinating. Tell us more... or just Delete this SpamCruft nonsense before people actually start doing this ++Deiz 02:31, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. It's not notable or well written. Royboycrashfan 02:34, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No verifiable information, Google yields no relevant results. Besides, it sounds more like a middle school rebel-rousing clique than a notable group worthy of a page. --Kinu 02:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Royboycrashfan. --Ardenn 03:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-verifiable, probably neologism. Dr Debug (Talk) 03:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Agreeing with Kinu, even if true, not notable. --Lockley 17:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as either complete bollocks or unverifiable vanity trivia cruft (i.e. bollocks, just not complete bollocks) Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C]
21:34, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
