Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifton d'souza

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 17:50, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Clifton d'souza

Non-notable--same content and anon contributor as December 13 1979, Vfd'd above. Only one hit for "Clifton d'souza", which may or may not be this person. Niteowlneils 5 July 2005 00:13 (UTC)

• Delete vanity and ALL CAPS. Jaxl 5 July 2005 00:34 (UTC)
• Delete non notable vanity. JamesBurns 5 July 2005 01:55 (UTC)
• Delete Econrad 5 July 2005 01:57 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable/vanity and written in a self-aggrandizing pov. -- BMIComp (talk) 5 July 2005 06:53 (UTC)
• Delete as noted above. --Habap 5 July 2005 14:39 (UTC)
• (Speedily deletable under Proposal 1? No. Article "asserts importance" by asserting that the subject is the "GREATEST PHILANTHROPIST,LEADER,SOCIALIST AND NOBLE MEN OF THE NEW WORLD". Speedily deletable under Proposal 2? Yes. Subject is 25 right now and article cites no sources of any kind.) The article doesn't satisfy the WP:BIO criteria, and a search turns up exactly 2 Cliftons d'Souza, neither of whom appear to be this person. Delete. Uncle G 5 July 2005 14:54 (UTC)
• Comment - So, if it had been 1978 instead of 1979, that difference would have made this unspeediable? -- Jonel | Speak 5 July 2005 19:58 (UTC)
• Delete I think this should have been speedied Pedant 2005 July 5 19:01 (UTC)
• How about speedy delete as a joke, since we all know that the subject is not, in fact, the "GREATEST PHILANTHROPIST,LEADER,SOCIALIST AND NOBLE MEN OF THE NEW WORLD"? -- BD2412 ^talk July 5, 2005 21:08 (UTC)
• Delete vanity/nonsensical shouting, make it stop. --Etacar11 5 July 2005 22:54 (UTC)
• Doesn't anyone have the balls to do a speedy delete here? -R. fiend 8 July 2005 05:05 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.