Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cincy Weather
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. I won't touch Daniel Johnson, however, as several users here seem to have that article well in hand. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 08:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cincy Weather
Delete. Advertisement for an irrelevant website, vanity. Doco 00:22, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I have also bundled the article about the author (Daniel Johnson) to be deleted alond with this one. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 00:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per WP:VSCA. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:31, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Ruby 00:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both. Note that one Dljohnson destroyed a disambiguation page for some notable Daniel Johnson's to create his vanity page - see here. This should be restored, and this self-publicist/vandal/chancer removed from Wikipedia forthwith! Camillus (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable, WP:VSCA. --Kinu t/c 01:12, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as unremarkable spam. -- Krash (Talk) 01:54, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - user 69.61.143.132, I assume owner of page keeps removing AfD notices. -- Tawker 02:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: per nom. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:39, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Rewrite to a more factual, less promo cruft article. If the author isn't willing to do that, well, I guess it will have to be deleted. --Jay(Reply) 03:56, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete If I may point out, Daniel Lee Johnson and Daniel Johnson. --Banana04131 04:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity. -- Samir ∙ TC 08:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as above. -- Death Eater Dan 14:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. TheRingess 07:52, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.