Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck andrews

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 06:58, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Chuck andrews

No evidence of notability. Delete. -gadfium 05:59, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 06:32, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• keep notable Chubby Chicken 15:38, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. Above recently created account, Chubby Chicken, is voting "keep, notable" for numerous clearly non-notable (indeed bordering on speedy) articles. Please keep that grain of information in mind when counting votes. -- BD2412 ^talk 20:14, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• delete not notable. Is Chubby Chicken perchance called Anthony? Dunc|☺ 16:07, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • All of Chubby Chicken's votes today in many different discussions are identical. They began at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Again, where Chubby Chicken has also removed the VFD notice. Uncle G 16:27, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• Geogre's Law applies again. WP:BIO criteria not met. Delete. Uncle G 16:27, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
• Delete even achieving "advanced highers in ... Big Headedness" does not make one notable. - DS1953 19:39, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• delete not notable (outside Renfrewshire) --TimPope 22:59, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.