Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Bilow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 18:47, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chuck Bilow

NN person, article says they worked on one game and worked for one small company which is no longer in business. Only 133 Google hits for "Chuck Bilow". Dismas|^(talk) 05:30, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

May I suggest that there is something wrong with your brain Dismas? Check out how much information is on the Chuck Bilow page (like you SHOULD of done to start off). You can be the person you are here on Wikipedia Dimas, WE ALL LOVE YOU (sarcasm). Whatever helps you sleep at night sweetheart. Let's continue this debate on the discussion page, shall we? Hucz 06:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

And you "should of" checked your spelling. The correct way to say this is "should've" or "should have". Why so many people fail to get this right is beyond me...- Mgm|^(talk) 12:47, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

PS - There's about 811 Google hits ;)...

Response on the discussion page since that's where Hucz wants my response... Dismas|^(talk) 07:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - 811 Google hots of the guy posting to messageboards... Artw 06:37, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Ohhh, Google hots... --Calton | Talk 07:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Calton | Talk 07:20, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator, I only get 133 hits, not 811. Silensor 07:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per Dismas. Also, only about 40 of those 133 are unique results. -- Kjkolb 07:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Mets501^talk 07:52, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. fel64 12:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Deli nk 12:43, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn. --Terence Ong 13:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.