Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Null
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:31, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Christopher Null
Poorly written advertising article about a non-notable individual; written by an IP that has been posting PR material for the organisation this fellow is a member of (Future Publishing). Suggest nuking out of orbit. NicholasTurnbull 17:27, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as above. --NicholasTurnbull 17:27, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- keep - probably vanity but his books are listed on amazon. --TimPope 20:44, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- I demur. Tim, what were you thinking? Amazon is a bookseller-- should any encyclopedia attempt to duplicate (and keep up to date) their catalog? Obviously not! ---CH (talk) 03:04, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Nuke Out of Orbit per nom. Karmafist 23:30, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, seems notable per his publications list. By the way, shouldn't it be "nuke from orbit"? Sdedeo 23:34, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
- I guess that depends on who is doing the orbiting? Kappa 00:14, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- It's like... oh... that is so horrible... I do not want to land on that planet... I will nuke from orbit. I think. My galactic overlord days are long over. Sdedeo 00:18, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- I suggest a quick refresher of Wikiquote:Aliens at this point. ☺ Uncle G 01:27:10, 2005-09-06 (UTC)
- It's like... oh... that is so horrible... I do not want to land on that planet... I will nuke from orbit. I think. My galactic overlord days are long over. Sdedeo 00:18, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- I guess that depends on who is doing the orbiting? Kappa 00:14, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, legitimate journalist and published author. Kappa 00:14, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep as per the established WP:BIO guidelines. Hall Monitor 17:06, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as nn and possible adspam. What is the circulation of this magazine? Looks to me like someone is trying rather desperately to increase this figure.---CH (talk) 03:00, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- Please compare this person's notability with that of Cyrus Farivar, which is a self-confessed vanity article. Kappa 03:13, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.