Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Hale, writer, producer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Christopher Hale, writer, producer

Vanity; non-notable. He "won a special award".. what for, exactly? Page was created by subject himelf. EuroSong ^talk 12:22, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Poorly written and poorly referenced vanity article. --Anthony.bradbury 12:58, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Book published by notable publishers in both the U.K. and the United States, and reviewed in The Times and The Daily Telegraph (or possibly The Sunday Telegraph - in any event, review found at http://www.telegraph.co.uk/ ). Note also that the book is quoted in the material for an anthropology course at http://www.csuchico.edu/~curban/syllabi/SYL_496-FA2006.html --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 16:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. -Kmaguir1 17:20, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Not all that well written, but basic notability established. LotLE×talk 19:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but needs rewriting, renaming and referencing properly. There are a lot of unsourced statements, and some ambiguous phrases ("make"? = wrote/directed/produced, etc?) Not being in the IMDb doesn't help. The JPS^{talk to me} 09:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
• keep claims unreferenced, but notable if true. no reason to delete. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.