Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chrissy Snow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep Marskell 11:15, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Chrissy Snow

No educational value. Not everyone in the world is familiar with her.152.163.100.203 03:36, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Possibly second-worst nomination ever.--Nicodemus75 03:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. That's a stupid reason for deletion. Nelson Ricardo 04:16, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep encyclopediae arent textbooks. valid article on notable subject. Nateji77 04:56, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Change vote to speedy keep. Nateji77 05:31, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep I'm sure the nominator isn't even trying to be serious with the absurd reasoning. --rob 05:17, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment the user contributions and ip addresses for this nom found here look similar to those for this nom, who also nominated the speedily-kept Three's Company article. if it's a single user rather than several users sharing ip addresses then heshe has also contributed to a number of articles on professional wrestling, which i personally feel to be of even less educational value than famous 70s sitcoms. not sure why you'd have an agenda against 3s company, tho. Nateji77 05:31, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• keep as per Jack Tripper and Three's Company. And while we're at it, a pre-emptive keep on any articles on Janet Wood, the Ropers, Man about the House, Robin Tripp, Chrissy Plummer, et al. Grutness...wha? 05:33, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. Sigh. Jkelly 07:07, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. The next time I write an article about a fictional character, I'll make it a point to travel all around the world, making sure even the old people and small children in small, remote African villages who have never used a computer have heard of them, just so it satisfies the Wikipedia inclusion guidelines. Not. — JIP | Talk 07:22, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.