Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chinalife

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chinalife

Ad with only one true Google hit -- the homepage. Draeco 00:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Draeco. SYCTHOS^talk 00:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 00:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup to comform to WP:NPOV. It's notable enough, with 73,700 Googles. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 00:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • There's only 39,700 hits in my area. Also, there are many organizations with the name "Chinalife." I don't think "BESTDEAL.ORG TRAVEL SITE - Travel Agent" or "China Life Blog: Food and Drink" would help much. Few relevant Google hits. Finally, www.chinalifeweb.com only gets an Alexa ranking of 3,080,163. SYCTHOS^talk 01:32, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete advertisement. *drew 01:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete advertisement. Ruby 02:28, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above Kareeser|^Talk! 02:32, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete advertisement/spam. timecop 12:45, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - advertising only, worthless, unexpandable -- Femmina 12:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Reads like a press release. I mean "With an infused knowledge of the East?" Please. Mark K. Bilbo 13:08, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, advertising. The article basically reads "Hello, we're a company, here's a link to our site." JIP | Talk 14:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per ad. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 19:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable online vendor. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-27 21:20Z
• Delete advertisement Nick Catalano (Talk) 00:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Blnguyen 07:19, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.