Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chapstick lesbian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge into Lipstick lesbian. Baseball,Baby! ^{balls•strikes} 05:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chapstick lesbian

Not notable; a neologism from the Ellen Degeneres Show. Benwing 08:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

• delete per nom. Ohconfucius 08:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as not notable but I wouldn't object to a merge to lipstick lesbian. MLA 09:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to lipstick lesbian. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 10:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 14:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to lipstick lesbian, as per Coredesat's comments. Scorpiondollprincess 16:50, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Merge to Butch and Femme along with lipstick lesbian per systematic bias. Relevant and notable term in the GLBT community. I have no doubt that these are good faith nominations and delete votes but the appearance here of such well known and actualized concepts of a sizable minority seems to scream "Systematic Bias". If properly expanded and source, these articles provide a considerable service to Wikipedia in shedding light on an area of knowledge that most in a straight-dominated world do not see.Agne 17:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment In retrospect, I think a merge of the information in this and the lipstick article would be better suited in the Butch and Femme article. Both concepts pay off of several themes within the Butch and Femme article and they would be stronger included then left as an article on their own. Agne 08:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Systematic bias? The terms nominated had no verification with reliable sources. All that's needed are some sources, really, but I think it'd work better as part of another article, since it's an "extension" of an existing term. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 19:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect to lipstick lesbian, since they're practically the same concept. --72.85.30.240 17:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Butch and femme. (The article on lipstick lesbian needs work itself--it first asserts that a lipstick lesbian is attracted to more femme types, then says that they are more attracted to butch types.) Both concepts might better fit in to a larger article on labels within the LGBTQ community to represent gender roles. -- Merope 18:30, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as a merge into appropriate parent article until it grows enough to stand on its own. - Davodd 20:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Any of the articles mentioned Konman72 06:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep seems enough notable. ev. merge -- Cate 16:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep 58.108.87.43 05:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.