Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaldean's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 20:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chaldean's

POV fork of Chaldean, duplicate article, I haven't even taken the time to check if its copyvio or not. Completely unsourced, OR, you name it, its there. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 23:47, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Strong delete per nom. This article is complete nonsense. —Khoikhoi 23:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I could overlook the fact that this is poorly written, prefaced with a POV rant, and the title uses the possessive case. These are editorial concerns. The rest of the article though is duplication of Chaldea, blatent copyright violations of images, original research... because much of the article is not sourced by the sources listed in the article... and it ends with more unsourced POV. Based on that, this should be deleted. The only thing I'm curious about is why this was brought to AfD when it already was PROD'd 3 days ago and as far as I can tell the PROD was not disputed?--Isotope23 00:23, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Just in case the prod is contested and I forget about it. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 01:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• Put it on your Watch list. If someone edits it to remove the Prod, it will pop back up to the top. Fan-1967 01:18, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
  • My Watchlist is over 3500 articles. I can't watch everything on it.⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 22:28, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete POV fork and dumb as a post. Does he actually believe the ancient Chaldeans used a flag? Brianyoumans 01:35, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Remembers on Age of Empires information. I can not verify it myself. Watch, remove OR, delete later on if neccessary. Article uses layout. User:Yy-bo 23:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment, if you remove all of the OR and copyvio images, all you have left is information already at Chaldea, making this a duplicate article.--Isotope23 00:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment True, its a duplicate article. Does not really look bad. Probably the people of chaldea is not the same as the chaldean people. User:Yy-bo 17:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Its a joke. And this is coming from a Chaldean. Chaldean 02:02, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.