Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certified eCommerce Consultants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete this and co-nominated articles. Deville (Talk) 02:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

For the record, I found a couple of other articles of exactly the same type created by the same editor; I deleted these as well --- Deville (Talk) 02:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Certified eCommerce Consultants

Extremely close to pure article WP:SPAM. Full of jargon and contextless content, smells like copyvio as well. Standby, I'm nominating the sister articles as well. (|-- UlTiMuS 21:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Here are 4 more from the same family:

• International Project Management Commission
• Certified emarketing analyst
• Project Manager E-Business
• American Academy of Project Management

All are full of the same unsourced jargon spam. Delete all (|-- UlTiMuS 21:44, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• Also note the ICECC redirect, which should go/stay with the rest. (|-- UlTiMuS 21:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 21:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• Don't Delete Dr. K K Lam I teach E-Commerce at City University in Hong Kong and this body provides great support to our students along with certification. It is legitimate and deserves a place within Wiki.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.227.103.182 (talk • contribs).

  For the record, this account has done two things: make this comment here, and insert linkspam on another article. I'm disregarding this comment, obviously --- Deville (Talk) 02:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.