Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caws.ws
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. SushiGeek 07:50, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Caws.ws
Gamecruft. Only 519 Google hits. Ranked 102,705 in Alexa Bige1977 23:26, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment At first I thought it was an obvious delete until I noticed that it has been in both #172 of Gamesmaster and Official Playstation 2 Magazine. I'm abstaining for now but if the article is to stay it needs a huge cleanup and to be written in a more NPOV. Englishrose 19:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Because it has been mentioned in two big magazines (one of them has quite a large piece on it), it may be subject of inclusion based on "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." via WP:WEB. However, it needs a massive clean-up and rewrite. Englishrose 19:15, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete per WP:WEB and nominator. Need verification of the above-mentioned magazine entries to keep. Stifle (talk) 21:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- There's a scan on Gamesmaster article in the article itself. [1] Englishrose 10:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It just about fits in to WP:WEB per the magazine entrees. Englishrose 22:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep The site is growing at a rapid rate and is now the internets most popular CAW site. By being listed in a large magazine you could say the site is "going places" and with a clean up of the article it should stay. 86.139.206.101 22:31, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.