Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canoe (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - nomination withdrawn. Mindmatrix 19:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Canoe (disambiguation)

Pointless DAB. Only one real article with this term. Precedent set by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Distant Early Warning (disambiguation) — P199 22:30, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

I withdraw my submission for deletion after Mindmatrix re-org and additions on April 6. -- P199 17:58, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• keep I beg to dif. I think that if there are two terms it should be used. Canoe is a web site and Canoe is a boat. So keep the disambiguation page. --CyclePat 23:21, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per CyclePat. "Canoe" (the website) meets the criteria of WP:WEB. Fluit 23:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
• 'Keep - needed. For great justice. 00:03, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep There are two articles in the disambig. Fetofs ^Hello! 00:38, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If there are only two articles to disambiguate, usually the articles should simply reference each other at the top. We don't need this. Grandmasterka 00:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC) Strong keep, someone close this withdrawn nomination please. Grandmasterka 08:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
• In this kind of situation, it would be more appropriate to simply use one of the inline disambiguation templates. This really isn't necessary. Delete and just slap an inline dab on canoe. Bearcat 01:55, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Grandmasterka. --Khoikhoi 01:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Fluit. --Ardenn 01:56, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Normally in this situation I would vote for keep, but since there's only two of them, I'm going with Bearcat. Just put an inline disambig at the top of the articles. pm_shef 02:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Since there are only two meanings, Grandmasterka is correct. --Bduke 07:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Bearcat and others. As a matter of fact, I'm going to be bold and inline the disambig links (if they aren't already). Mangojuice 18:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Having that few entries definitely does not warrant a disambig page. --Andylkl ^{[ talk! | c ]} 09:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Am changing my vote to strong keep after seeing Mindmatrix's edits. :) --Andylkl ^{[ talk! | c ]} 17:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I've updated the list with more information. Mindmatrix 15:38, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep now. Samaritan 07:24, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.