Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canal Building

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete, merge tag has already been added. W.marsh 05:19, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Canal Building

Delete Not significant enough to deserve an article; sufficent information appears (or at least should appear) in the main Worcester College article. Yellowspacehopper 14:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete (or merge, if the content is worth keeping) unless someone wants to rewrite it as an article about the building of canals. --Xyzzyplugh 16:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge the data back into Worcester College, let the editors there determine if it is worth retaining. There seems to be some additional content, but not worth a seperate article. Kuru ^talk 16:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge the info in the college's article (per Kuru); delete the actual building. --Alf ^melmac 16:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Kuru, and delete the article. --Terence Ong 17:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Kuru. Bucketsofg 18:26, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• merge per Kuru. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 19:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge --Khoikhoi 02:08, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Looking at this article and the Worcester College article, I can not see that there is anything to merge. The main points are really there. It just has to go. --Bduke 08:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: Nothing in this article is worth merging. --Hetar 08:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing notable mentioned, not even photo. Pavel Vozenilek 22:10, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, This article has no useful information for what is being looked for. It should be put in the Worcester College article.
• Delete nn. -- mmeinhart 23:45, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.