Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Tawonga (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep -- Longhair 22:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Tawonga

• Keep A generally well-written article, a camp with 80 years of history, and 17,800 Google hits for "Camp Tawonga" is enough for me. -- Kicking222 03:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking222. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 04:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking 222. gidonb 08:33, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking 222. —Viriditas | Talk 09:20, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking222, and as Viriditas mentioned in the previous Afd, praised by San Francisco Chronicle, became notable for being the first camp in North America to host the first Palestinian summer family peace camp [1] [2] [3], among other things. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 10:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if and only if rewritten to produce an article of externally verifiable information taken from reliable and displayed sources (both those mentioned by Viriditas in the aborted previous deletion discussion and others) -- saberwyn 10:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep this camp is a significant institution of Secular Jewish culture. It also teaches about a very liberal aspect of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. IZAK 12:47, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - read above. --HolyRomanEmperor 13:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking222. --Terence Ong 13:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - does establish notability. --Tom 13:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Tom. —Khoikhoi 14:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking222 -- Avi 15:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per evidence provided by MPerel... though the crufty traditions, staff, etc sections should be jettisoned and text relating to MPerel's comments should be added. Right now, without visiting this AfD the article is about a summer camp that is completely indistinguishable from any summer camp anywhere else in the U.S.--Isotope23 17:05, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep. This article about an obviously notable summer camp has already survived an AfD, this second AfD is completely out of process. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. Ted 22:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep needs a trim.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! - review me 00:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, obviously notable, malformed nomination, consensus already reached previously. Silensor 00:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Kicking 222. --Shlomke 03:27, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -- I already voted to keep this before, I vote so again -- thank you, DR., for wasting my time by making me do this over and over... Rooster613rooster613Rooster613 01:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. Ckessler 09:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.