Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Idiot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete. Mo0[talk] 04:45, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Camp Idiot
670k on alexa, doesn't meet WP:Web, WP is not a web guide, not notable or significant, no indication of why it should even have an article, Delete Dbchip 01:06, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete I may go ahead and speedy this baloney MONGO 02:36, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Seems to be more of an advertisement for the site. Das Nerd 06:53, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kreydon 12:21, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable spam. Try WikiDirectory instead. --StuffOfInterest 13:32, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SPAM. Cue the Vikings... Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 17:12, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - non notable vanity. Barneyboo (Talk) 17:15, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Discussions With Sock Puppets
- Dont Delete If you delete this entry I expect you will go ahead and also delete the entries for other online communities like Genmay, Fuckedcompany, b3ta and stormfront.org unsigned comment by 24.159.251.82
- No, because they are (a) interesting and (b) notable. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 19:06, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- How is GenMay.net more notable and interesting than CampIdiot.com? unsigned comment by 24.159.251.82
- Based on how popular GenMay.net is and how unpopular CampIdiot.com is according to Alexa Dbchip 19:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Since when did having something defined become a popularity contest? Sure we can elaborate the definition and include history on how the site was first known as heekee.com and other "interesting" tidbits, but if the definition is just going to get deleted why bother unsigned comment by 24.159.251.82
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a web directory or dictionary. In order for a web site to be listed on WP, it must notable (or popular, thus making it notable); this site is neither. Dbchip 20:02, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- Since when did having something defined become a popularity contest? Sure we can elaborate the definition and include history on how the site was first known as heekee.com and other "interesting" tidbits, but if the definition is just going to get deleted why bother unsigned comment by 24.159.251.82
- Based on how popular GenMay.net is and how unpopular CampIdiot.com is according to Alexa Dbchip 19:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- How is GenMay.net more notable and interesting than CampIdiot.com? unsigned comment by 24.159.251.82
- No, because they are (a) interesting and (b) notable. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 19:06, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.