Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Gesher (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 16:04, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Camp Gesher

Question: Why wasn't the original creator of this article informed about the votes for deletion? Now it's posted at User talk:JamieJones. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IZAK (talk • contribs).

No vote yet. Dr Zak 01:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, notable, camp is mentioned multiple times in Canadian Jewish News, site of North Americans first weight loss and fitness Jewish camp. --MPerel ^{( talk | contrib)} 10:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Terence Ong 13:19, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep informative article adds knowledge about Jewish Canadians and instruction in the Hebrew language in Canada. IZAK 13:34, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, since there are no guidelines for summer camps, I simply don't see anything that distinguishes this particular summer camp.--Isotope23 17:14, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. As before. Camp is mentioned in more than one article in Canadian Jewish News, site of North Americans first weight loss and fitness Jewish camp, certainly as notable as most elementary school articles and many entries in Category:Summer camps, such as Camp takajo or Woodward Camp, or indeed almost any of the camps in that category, almost all of which are referenced at best by a link to the camp's website. Jayjg ^(talk) 20:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Habonim Dror or other suitable place. Ted 22:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per JayJg. --Shlomke 03:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep -- I already voted to keep this before, I vote so again -- thank you, DR., for wasting my time by making me do this over and over... Rooster613rooster613Rooster613 01:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - as it is, article asserts no notability. Like many of these other articles under AfD, this veers close to copyvio territory and is in desperate need of a rewrite to be encyclopedic. B.Wind 12:55, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.