Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cake Pony

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cake Pony

Cake Pony (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable webcomic: fails the Web content notability guidelines. Author's only edits are to this article and related pages (images, and adding it to List of webcomics). The only internal links to it are from the aforementioned list and article request lists.

Additionally, the article as it is now is full of original research. --Slowking Man 09:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

This page was created in response to other wiki's such as the "wikifur" and "encyclopedia dramatica" creating false and possibly slanderous comments about this webcomic.To the contrary of other descriptions about this comic on the internet, this article is an objective description available from a primary source, ie the creator of the webcomic this article refers to. It is my hope that this article is not deleted as it contains valuable and factual information about a popular internet meme. If I have not properly cited myself while using 3rd person language as required by wiki rules, than I would be glad to edit the article rather than see it deleted. Slorpthegillman 11:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Andrew Klein of Cake Pony

I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a webhost. Additionally, material contributed by the author(s) of a work violates our policy prohibiting original research and our guidelines on conflicts of interest and autobiographies. --Slowking Man 12:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per Slowking Man. Scienter 15:14, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - WP is not a publisher of first instance, a webhost, or a means for the creators of artwork to respond to their critics. Sam Clark 20:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - It's entirely unencyclopedic. You can edit the WikiFur article if you like, and the ED article will probably get deleted eventually because no one has heard of it and the article isn't funny (which is their main criteria). - hahnchen 17:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.