Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Café Catholica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Non-notable. El_C 10:07, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Café Catholica

delete per Wikipedia is not a soapbox. This is a very minor event. Google finds 48 non-wikipedia links, mostly catholic blogs advertising the event. I guess we could say "cathocruft"... No coverage I could find from reliable, independent sources. Pascal.Tesson 00:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:21, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete - non-notable, only 97 Google hits (most are from Wikipedia) --Ineffable3000 00:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -AMK152 01:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per apparent nonexistance of any coverage outside of blogs and webforums. --W.marsh 02:18, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Michael 02:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Religio-cruft ReverendG 03:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable.UberCryxic 03:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Crosscruft. Sacred spam. Pious puffery. Robert A.West (Talk) 06:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Puns seem to be the way to go with this AfD vote, but it's nearly 2 AM and I'm not sure I could top what's already here. --S0uj1r0 07:54, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete per all AdamBiswanger1_{R.I.P. Steve Irwin} 13:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, and possibly merge the introduction to Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Galveston-Houston. Not notable enough for its own article. TheronJ 13:55, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails to assert notability. -Elmer Clark 21:42, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.