Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CRAEDO
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] CRAEDO
Non-notable. Does not appear to have members. THB 04:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Unless someone can prove it's notability. —Khoikhoi 04:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. NN. Search for "craedo and coalition" in google yields
~=500< 50 hits. No matches in Lexis in European newspapers. Pan Dan 14:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Correction. Re-checking (I don't know what I did wrong before), I see that craedo coalition has < 50 ghits. And searching for just craedo gets 150 unique ghits. Pan Dan 14:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Verified member of the Vancouver Board of Trade (http://www.boardoftrade.com/vbot_directory.asp?dirID=272&directory=C&pageID=537). Verified appearance as witness in front of Canada's Federal Finance Committee in October 2005. It appears website is still being developed. Polykrator 04:50, 11 September 2006 — Polykrator (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
-
- Any business or organization can join the Vancouver Board of Trade. That in itself does not lend legitimacy (or notability). -THB 16:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- My-bullshit-detector-just-exploded Delete Google search for "Codin Alexander Olteanu" yields 2 hits, this article and the CRAEDO site. I'm not even bothering with Newsbank. ~ trialsanderrors 09:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- That's the funniest way of stating it I ever read. Thanks for brightening up my day! -THB 16:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- No evidence of members or activity on site -- users forum at http://www.craedo.com/forum/ shows several posts on 6/10 and 11 of 2004, with no followups by anyone, ever. Cshirky 19:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.