Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CIRBAS
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] CIRBAS
Contested speedy. Article on a non notable, university based research centre. Currently reads like spam, with a hint of vanity Nuttah68 17:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Keep Subject of the article is a research facility in New Delhi, India located at the Jamia Millia Islamia university. This research facility appears to be notable and important in the field of Science Research within India. As a reminder, Wikipedia recommends avoiding describing "vanity" when referring to deletion of an article "as the term can be considered insulting to the subjects of articles." [[1]] Drew30319 20:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep needs a rewrite to read less like a pamphlet, but if its claims can be substantiated, it seems notable enough. Danny Lilithborne 22:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, article does not establish notability. The links are about the conference and only mention the institute in passing. --Chondrite 19:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or slicht merge to Jamia Millia Islamia. No substantial third party coverage, reads like an ad. Sandstein 14:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Several articles and sufficient information for "notability." CuriousGiselle 19:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak delete - primary purpose seems to promote the conference as other sections have been neglected. A more rounded, objective article - one with the research facility as the focus instead of a conference - is much more appropriate. B.Wind 02:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Kungfu Adam (talk) 15:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I could not find any trace of CIRBAS at Jamia Millia Islamia's website. Moreover, according to reference [4] in the article, the conference described in the first paragraph has been cancelled. There is practically nothing else beside that, so I'd say Delete. Stammer 20:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as there is no 3rd party vrification, even if there was, it's still non-notable (verification <> notability). SkierRMH,08:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
