Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Byron De Lear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Petros471 13:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Byron De Lear

non-notable third party candidate, reads like a campaign ad. -Steve Sanbeg 17:41, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable. -THB 20:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete wikipedia not webhosting. Scary to see such articles, having in mind they write them as vanity. How much do they verify things in reality, if they just ignore WP:WP, WP:LAYOUT that way? User:Yy-bo 22:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Not-Notable is a matter of personal opinion as is your subjective view on the content.. This should not be grounds for deletion.. I'm sure Byron can provide evidence for any questions you might have...

I apologise for not following the wiki format. I'll definately get into looking at that.. this is my first wiki article.. I find this whole things very interesting.. I'll work on making the article more wikiable..

Thanks,

User:iroessle

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.