Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bvllets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 04:41, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bvllets

Delete - appears to be vanity (all edits before this one are from one anon editor) - Bvllets gets about about 52 real Google hits, many of which are not on point. -- BD2412 ^talk 00:10, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Vanity.Shelburne Kismaayo 01:54, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Friday (talk) 02:42, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Hilarious.Tito Martinez 23:56, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
  • ^{Above edit actually by 24.184.211.34. -- BD2412 talk 03:57, 6 October 2005 (UTC)}
• Keep --24.211.134.8 04:05, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

User's fourth edit Karmafist 04:07, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete vanity.--Alhutch 06:18, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom: vanity.--Qirex 07:30, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-notable. utcursch | talk 11:17, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn, vanity. Marcus22 14:14, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete even if every google hit were on target, his claims to fame are a non-notable blog and a non-notable record label. That equals a nn-bio in my book.--Isotope23 15:06, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - nn vanity CLW 18:52, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Alf ^melmac 08:14, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.