Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bush bashing
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Ral315 (talk) 04:19, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Bush bashing
Unencyclopaedic article, potentially violating of NPOV by trivializing criticism to mindless ad hominem attack. Frostyservant 04:57, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per nomination.
- Delete Bashing is a general term, and applies to anyone. No reason to have a special page devoted to Bush bashing. Cynicism addict 05:38, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per the Cynic. Andrew Levine 05:45, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per Cynicism addict. rmosler 06:56, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Cynicism Addict. --JJay 16:29, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Update as this is a well known and widely spoken term, or perhaps move to Wikitionary, and give a better description of term. wikicali
- Delete. Anyone can be bashed. --Optichan 19:00, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Contains no information beyond what is implicit in the title. The phrase "Bush bashing" is not an idiom, and has no overtones or connotations beyond the plain meaning of the words. Do not move to Wiktionary, nor we do not need entries here or in Wiktionary for "Alito-bashing", "Hollander bashing," "Big East bashing," "administration-bashing," "BCS bashing," "America bashing," "Brit-bashing," "Bloomy bashing," "Miers-bashing," and "Catholic bashing," to pick a few at random from a Google News search. Dpbsmith (talk) 20:11, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per Dpbsmith. --Cactus.man ✍ 08:31, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. HGB 22:37, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per above Astroview120mm 02:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.