Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Bullet (disambiguation). — JIP | Talk 06:29, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bullett

Appears to be band vanity. (Does not appear to meet WP:MUSIC guidelines. There is a band of that name on allmusic.com, but it seems to be a different one.) Delete - borderline speedy deletion candidate as spam. - Mike Rosoft 19:35, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect without merging to Bullet. --fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 19:42, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Bullitt, not Bullet. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:02, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as there is no obvious conection to either bullet or bullitt :-) - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:26, 3 November 2005 (UTC) - see below
• Redirect to.... Bullet (disambiguation), where I just added Bullitt as a likely misspelled search term for folks seeking the latter. This will guide bad spellers from both directions. :-D BD2412 T 01:20, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Clever lad! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 02:31, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Looks good to me! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 03:01, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • I am mightily fond of this display of clever brain! Yes, I am! Let the redirection commence! -- Captain Disdain 04:46, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Quick thinking that man. Redirect per above. - Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 08:10, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. one line with a link is not an article..Dakota ? e 06:58, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.