Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brokat AG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep and cleanup. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 00:41, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brokat AG

non-notable Grocer 01:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. If a few references could be added, the article would make an excellent addition to Wikipedia. —Eternal Equinox | talk 03:09, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. The article reads somewhat like a trainwreck, but notability is there. With a little cleanup, it will work well as a viable article.--み使い Mitsukai 05:07, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I am a former employee of Brokat and edited many parts of the entry. I would like to know which wikipedia policy was violated.
• Keep, Brokat has been a notable company for almost half a decade. JIP | Talk 13:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment, I added a cleanup tag. No opinion on inclusion/deletion, but this article is crying for a complete rewrite for formatting, tone/language, and notability/sourcing. I'm in IT and while reading this I found myself wondering why I should care about this company or its products. I'm not trying to be offensive to the author, but you need to make a better case for why this company and their products are important. Also, adding sources for this information would be very helpful.--Isotope23 19:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Just clean it up. --Krashlandon (e) 21:48, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 10:05, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.