Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brodequin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ifnord 20:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brodequin

band un-notability Melaen 00:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per above Liamdaly620 00:49, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NMG. PJM 01:12, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, although I had never heard of them before, they seem to have a reputation among fans of death metal worldwide (take note the wide variety of languages used throughout all these websites). It appears this is not the classic nn bandity, with a 7-year career behind their backs and 3 albums listed in Amazon. - Phædriel ♥ ^{tell me} - 01:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Google search for +Brodequin +"death metal" returns a sufficient number of websites about them. --Ezeu 04:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Notable, but the article needs a lot of work. → P.MacUidhir (t) (c) 05:05, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. --Terence Ong 05:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep with cleanup tag -- Astrokey44|talk 15:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but it needs to be expanded. As a great fan of the band, I would be happy to clean the article up and expand it. AdamSebWolf 19:25, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep with cleanup tag Jim62sch 20:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, they have no allmusic or artistdirect page, they have no listing at amazon.com (interesting that they do at amazon.de), their website has no alexa ranking, and apparently you can only buy their music via their record company's website. User:Zoe|^(talk) 23:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

]

• Keep as multiple albums on a notable record label meets WP:MUSIC. Stifle 16:27, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
  • What notable record label? One that only sells records online? User:Zoe|^(talk) 19:14, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.