Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brijbrij

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --JoanneB 14:31, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Brijbrij

School essay with nonsense title. I originally tagged as copyvio a while back for some reason, can't really speedy it because it doesn't seem to fit the criteria. AfD away and delete in a week it is. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 00:04, 29 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- Wow. Just have to ask: Why? The Hooded Man 00:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I think that's called "unclear on the concept." Guess, no original research? Mark K. Bilbo 01:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, I hope this paper didn't get better than a C. "Rests in obscurity"? Hardly. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I wonder why the author thought Wikipedia would want his essay on Che Guevara, when he used Wikipedia's own article on Che Guevara as one of his sources. --Metropolitan90 04:49, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --негіднийлють ^{(Reply|Spam Me!*)} 05:53, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Che Guevara - The title is actually, of course "Ernesto Guevara", which returns quite a mass of google hits. In fact, if this student was willing to allow us to, we might be able to move some of it over to Ernesto_Guevara (aka Che Guevara). Are we allowed to do that? I don't know the policy. Considering that Che Guevara has a tag about factual accuracy, an essay like this might be just what it needs to improve its accuracy. Zordrac 08:40, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
  • We can merge the text of this article anywhere on Wikipedia under the GNU Free Documentation License which applies to all contributions to Wikipedia. But this is just a student essay which was researched from, among other places, Wikipedia, which makes it unlikely that it will help the accuracy of Che Guevara. By the way, the main article title is Che Guevara; Ernesto Guevara, the subject's given name, is a redirect to the more commonly used name Che Guevara. --Metropolitan90 03:58, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NSLE _{(讨论+extra)} 09:40, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This doesn't belong within 100 yards of wikipedia. --Bachrach44 20:01, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 21:42, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Some student's paper on Che Guevara, no idea why it's posted here.Chuckhoffmann 07:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.