Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breakstone, White-Lief & Gluck, P.C.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Breakstone, White-Lief & Gluck, P.C.
Delete an extremely NN law firm. There are thousands of law firms in this country. A tremendous number are bigger than this one. On WP we have articles only for a couple dozen biggest ones. This has to fail WP:CORP. Finally, it's promotional. - CrazyRussian talk/email 17:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per reasons above. CPAScott 17:54, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable Avi 19:15, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to be a fairly standard torts firm. Notability not shown. Smerdis of Tlön 20:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. It is a specialist law firm and one with some high-profile members. That is an assertion of notability. I agree that the majority of law firms are non-notable, but often a law firm's involvement in a high-profile case or "hot" area of the law makes it notable. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:28, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:CORP. --Metropolitan90 02:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - looking at articles online, it seems to be a small firm of ambulance chasers (literally - one of their biggest malpractice cases involved an ambulance firm). They have had a few large settlements, but it doesn't look like they have gotten much notice outside of the Massachusetts bar. Their practice appears to be solely in Massachusetts. --Brianyoumans 04:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.