Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breaking the seal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:32, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Breaking the seal

Delete WP:WINAD Schizombie 07:52, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Bobby1011 08:06, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. Kusonaga 09:16, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Per nom Shaggorama 10:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination VirtualSteve 11:15, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ugh. --Lockley 16:41, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 17:20, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Complete bollocks! Even if this term and concept were to exist and to be notable, the explanation given is incoherent nonsense.  (aeropagitica)  20:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense, variety non-patent. -ikkyu2 (talk) 01:12, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. —ERcheck @ 06:03, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
• Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks! -- ~~~~ Deco 23:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.