Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahmin influence on other religions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 03:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brahmin influence on other religions

Delete as a straight-up WP:NOR violation - CrazyRussian talk/email 05:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Completely unsourced, and rather unnotable. Although, I wouldn't object to a properly cited article on the subject if one were made. tmopkisn ^tlka 06:01, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It is disjointed, unsourced, POV, ethnocentric and has not been improved in any manner despite many attempts to get contributors to subscribe to WP guidelines for contributions and is descending into warring edits over non-compliant material.--Tigeroo 08:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research and a soapbox for touting a personal point of view on things in essay form. Byrgenwulf 09:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Do not Delete. This article is not ethnocentric as the chauvinistic neo-Buddhists are trying are convince Wikipedia authorities it is. The neo-Buddhists are always insaulting Brahmins for the dissapearence of Buddhism in India and when Brahmins show how much historical Brahmins have contributed, the neo-Buddhists try to cover it up from history. If the case is that this article is unsourced I can source everything, but this article has to remain to show the world the jealousy of the neo-Buddhists. -- maleabroad

• Delete. Sorry, but it's still original research. Wikipedia is not a soapbox. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• This article needs to be deleted. It is clearly evident that this article has been put up with a complete political agenda. there is no encyclopaedic value of this article.--Yeditor 13:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Original research, POV, and unbalanced, e.g. it utterly ignores the fact that non-Hindu religious traditions have sometimes been critical of Brahminical Hinduism in practice. There might be an interesting article in here, but this isn't it. Anirvan 18:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.