Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boomerang (penis)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 07:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Boomerang (penis)

Rridicolous content for an encyclopedia Jestix 17:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete There exists an article already for this condition Peyronie's_disease. There isn't need for a duplicated article, as well as a blurry photo of male genitalia. --Porqin 18:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete inasmuch as the topic, certainly an encyclopedic one and not at all ridiculous (at least where properly presented) is appropriately addressed at Peyronie's disease and Penis#Normal variations. Whilst a redirect to Peyronie's might be appropriate, a Googling returns few results relative to the use of the locution, such that a mention at boomerang (disambiguation), linking to Peyronie's per WP:DAB and consistent with the formulation employed with boner, should suffice; I added such mention (the dab page previously contained a link to this article). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jahiegel (talk • contribs).

Just a site note, do we have to google test *everything*? Is google really an aproperiate mean to ask for encyclopedic relevance? (I know the WP: site talking about that...) --19:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Agree with our verbose friend Jahiegel. -- Slowmover 18:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as redundant. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 20:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or at least redirect. No need for a duplicate article for each piece of slang. Piccadilly 23:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as redundant. Furthermore, the photo – uploaded by JADPadgett (contribs), who appears to be the author of the article – is captioned as "Source: Paul Waterman, Sheffield University". But the user's description of the upload reads, "I took this picture myself." This obscure slang for Peyronie's doesn't add anything, except maybe titillation. — VoxLuna ^(talk)  05:28, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Since there is no evidence to suggest that this is common usage, no need to redirect. --Nlu (talk) 22:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.