Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BogusForth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BogusForth

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Not notable, no sources, no one uses it, nothing beyond a joke. - Hahnchen 17:21, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Although not simple to merge, it's lack of verifiability makes me uneasy keeping it as a seperate article. Likely any derivative works would be more based off this language's base languages than BogusForth itself. LinaMishima 01:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't think that the mass delete was out of order. They were all so similar that they could hve been grouped into a table. As individual entries, they are of no use to anybody. This one certainly deserves the chop. Ohconfucius 05:08, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as Wikipedia is not for things made up in university one day. Again, pretty much free of content.
• Comment Here's the past esolang AfD box (many, but not all, of these are relevant):

Dates shown are the date on which the debate started. Previous Esoteric programming language-related deletion debates: No result Votes for Deletion (multiple nomations), September 29 2004 Keep Votes for Deletion (Lazy K), November 26 2004 Delete Articles for Deletion (Obfuscated Weird Language), August 22 2005 Delete 1, keep 2 Articles for Deletion (3 languages), February 24 2006 No result Articles for Deletion (4 languages), February 24 2006 No consensus Articles for Deletion (3 languages), April 5 2006 Delete most Articles for Deletion (multiple nominations), August 31 2006 Overturn and relist Deletion Review, September 7 2006

--ais523 08:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.