The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Deathphoenixʕ 15:40, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Vague, unsourced, possibly original research. Linked by only two articles. - Sikon 17:23, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete Appears to be New-age neologism psychocruft. Artw 19:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Very POV as it stands, as well. Tevildo 19:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.