Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (A7), no credible assertions of notability. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-11-27 07:36Z

[edit] Bobology

Bobology (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

I originally tagged it as speedy under A7, however it has been altered since then to assert notability, however dubious. A religion created in 2006 by 5 friends, now claims to have 50,000 adherents. Some related google hits[1], but no real sources, seems like either an online prank or just plain old WP:BOLLOCKS Either way the article is unsourced and appeared to be unverifiable Dina 21:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unverifiable unsourced COI nonsense. Demiurge 22:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete; Although the religion may not be a hoax and in fact real, at the moment this article should be deleted under WP:V and WP:N, because it doesn't provide any references for its notability. Jayden54 22:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I have no words...WP:BOLLOCKS says it all. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c} 22:10, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 23:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. WP:TOO SILLY FOR WORDS. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per norm. The article does not have a single link. meshach 00:57, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete a religion growing from nothing to 100,000 members in less than one year would be all over the media if it were true. Delete as obvious falsehood. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Considering everyone names everything silly "Bob", I'm reluctant to believe that this is a genuine article. Delete... Spawn Man 02:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.