Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob TV Shows

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bob TV Shows

Article is about a non-notable public access cable show. Prod removed by author Wildthing61476 14:26, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Can I ask how I can change the article so that it will be notable. The shows themselves are certainly "notable" in Rhode Island. Can you discuss this with me? corey111689@aol.com

• Certainly, there's always room for discussion, that's what this is all about. The most important thing the article needs is Reliable Sources: if the show has been covered in the press, say so, and be specific. The bigger and more well-known the source is, the better (generally speaking). Trivial mentions (TV listings, appearing in lists of shows, etc.) don't count. I'm going to hold off on voting until I see what sort of sources can be added. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:53, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Note Author is creating more articles on the same subject: Bob Venturini, Bob venturini. -- Fan-1967 15:00, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, with sources and a bit of a rewrite. He's obviously one of the most notable cable access talk show hosts overall, if he's travelled to 45 states and 5 continents. I'll work on this one. -- Zanimum 15:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Okay, I've cleaned the article up. It's now three articles (sorry), but three good small articles. Bob Venturini, Bob's Big Adventures, and An Hour with Bob. Now, if I can find sources for these articles, I can't see them harming anyone, sitting off to the side. It's perfectly clear in the articles that he is of relatively low notability, so no one will get confused, but everything that is covered is now fairly objective. -- Zanimum 15:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

• Thank You..... this was my first article so I wasnt exactly clear on how to do it. Looks good, Thanks.
• Delete. Nice job on the re-writes, Zanimum. Those articles should be fine. This one should now be deleted. There's no need for a redirect or disambiguation, at least not at this location, and all of the information is covered at the appropriate places. Kafziel 16:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 23:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, thanks to Zanimum's work splitting into appropriate articles. Andrew Levine 01:05, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per WP:CSD G7: seems the author doesn't want it any more either. Yomangani^talk 02:13, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete digital_me^{(Talk•Contribs)} 15:23, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, good work by Zanimum, this article is no longer necessary. Possibly speedy for housekeeping purposes. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per WP:CSD

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.