Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue hair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect to blue rinse. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:20, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Blue hair
A slang dicdef. Possibly a neologism too. Thue | talk 22:04, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
Keep, but clean up. The article goes beyond a dicdef, although it it still a stub. Also, the term has been used often enough, and for long enough, that it isn't a neologism. Still, it needs some work; for one thing, the author seems unfamiliar with the concept of blue rinse. Doctor Whom 23:06, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Redirect to Blue rinse, but mention in that article that "blue hair" is an alternate term. Beyond that, I see nothing in Blue hair worth merging. Doctor Whom 18:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- Is "blue hair" used more often than "blue rinse" in the States? (yes I just created blue rinse, because it needed doing and because this article's tone disparages older women, so I didn't want to move this one). - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 23:20, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- I, at least, have heard the term "blue hair" much more often than "blue rinse." Doctor Whom 18:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this term is actually "blue rinse", as in the blue rinse brigade, but that would be a dicdef anyway. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] :: AfD? 23:11, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to blue rinse, it's a better article. feydey 00:14, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to blue rinse. Capitalistroadster 00:57, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment FWIW: I don't have an opinion on this and I changed neither this article nor the Blue rinse article. What I DID do is create an article on bluing (fabric), the product, and I think the blue rinse article should maybe be merged into THAT article. But thats a different issue I guess. Herostratus 06:51, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- Speaking as the creator of blue rinse and a mergist, I support that if you can make the two work together well. There are obvious parallels, after all, and a common root and aim. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 20:48, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- On consideration, I vote redirect blue hair -> blue rinse. And pending blue rinse/bluing (product) merger negotiations, maybe Justzis you could add a link to bluing(product) to blue rinse if you get to it.Herostratus 06:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.