Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Dragonns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 11:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blood Dragonns

Self-admitted (see Blood Dragonns#Please Note) Warhammer 40,000 fanfiction. This article deals with a non-canonical Space Marines Space Marine Legion, which receives absolutely no mentions in any Warhammer 40,000 rulessets or fictional works, and breaches established canon. -- Saberwyn 05:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Warhammer 40,000-related deletions. -- -- Saberwyn 05:37, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete: Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day --Pak21 07:07, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, self-admitted fanfiction. JIP | Talk 16:23, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete with prejudice fancruft, per nom Hobbeslover 02:12, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT Gwernol 18:15, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable, WP:NFT. --TheKoG (talk|contribs) 15:16, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

Dont delete it! While it is fanfare i believe this is a good peice of work AND it can be used in a professional form says the rules of warhammer yes it is custom but if everything custom is deleted then nothing will ever be new it breachs some minor rules but the good outweighs the bad! sorry couldnt figure out how to do it like you guys did it so i just clicked edit sorry! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grogyboy (talk • contribs) .

Comment Grogyboy, just so you know, Wikipedia's policies on orignal research and verifiability is not "some minor rules" but two of the three central pillars of Wikipedia. Gwernol 01:40, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

okay so reading the rules on original research he techniocally didnt break them because of the way that the warhammer rules work they state that he can create his own and theirfore they sponser. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grogyboy (talk • contribs) .

Comment: The original research policy states that "original research is a term used on Wikipedia to refer to material added to articles by Wikipedia editors that has not been published already by a reputable source." Unless you can point to the reputable source that has already published this information, this article is original research and must be deleted. Technicalities based on what the 40k rules do or do not allow is irrelevant. Cheers --Pak21 13:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.