Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blake Van Leer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:11, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blake Van Leer

Doesn't seem to fullfill WP:BIO, seems to be vanity, as the article lemma and author are the same person (see my user talkpage) --Jestix 20:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh boy here we go again, We have Shazbot who is a member of an online gaming guild who dislikes a guild I'm in and harasses the members of that website a long with myself. Then we have Jestix who deletes or reverts every single ligit edit or article I add. I'm sure there is other articles you can find that really need to be deleted and are wasting wikipedia space. Since I can't seem to do anything about it, I will just play your game and continue to readd the article. If you delete my ip address, I own two office locations, two water front homes. I'll just keep readding them again again. Not just for kicks, but because your unfair and need to get a life. Best Regards,Blake911 04:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Dear BLake, please note that I'm not an Administrator and have not the power to delete pages, all I do is to nominate them for reviewal by the widely spread wikipedia community. Don't you realize that in most the cases they are unanimously? --Jestix 05:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Lock, @closing admin, since the author already announced he will keep readding the page because he feels it unfair the wikipedie community doesn't find him encyclopedic noteworthy, I would suggest to lock the lemma instead, if the discussion results into a delete. --05:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

I have noticed that it is unaimously decied due to the fact many members from an online gaming community have decided to follow or watch my articles and edits. Again I'm just getting the hang of wikipedia and realizing, it appears to be a website that anyone can log on and edit, delete, alter or add false information posted by other people. Sometimes it can be helpful.... but I only use it as a last resort because you can post completely false information here......sure it will probably be editted and corrected, but not immediately. In some cases important or notable information is even editted or deleted.

Blake911 06:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Conspiracy theories don't really accomplish anything. Contrary to your belief, not everyone disagreeing with you is a member of what you seem to think is a guild of epic proportions, able to garner massive support on Wikipedia to squelch the voice of a small new user. Shazbot85Talk 06:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Shazbot do you ever give up? haha don't you have anything better to do than to be a shadowclan puppet?

  • Delete, Fails WP:BIO. Subject doesn't qualify for notablity at this time. The Bethling 09:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment

Found several links making the article more than qualify for notability.

Actor Database Listed here

Below the belt show Has him listed as well a long with other celebrities.

Ali and Jack morning show Also listed here on a popular national talk show.

Maryland Newspaper Has him listed as well in several articles.

Movie company Has him listed in several pilots. The movie company is known as Metropolis Pictures and it's owner as well as the company is listed on the internet movie database IMDB

Thordice 19:39, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/r/t/Wikipedia%7EArticles_for_deletion_Blake_Van_Leer_0580.html"