Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Diamond Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete - Richardcavell 22:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Black Diamond Records

Two non-notable people on Myspace and another Internet site, basically. No further assertions of notability are made.Crystallina 22:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

I am also nominating the DJ Hyrule article for deletion under the same grounds.

• Delete Not notable. Nertz 23:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Google gets just about 10,800,000 for "Black Diamond Records". So they seem notable enough.--Jusjih 00:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I have no idea if that was supposed to be a keep vote or a delete vote. Also, I'm not sure where that 10,800,000 number came from. -- 17:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

There is no reason for this page to be deleted. We are notable in our town of Midlothian, Virginia. What is the real reason we should be deleted?.--User:ktorp18 13:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

• • Comment Notability in WP:MUSIC is asserted (in one way) by being a defining act of a major music scene, not just any suburb of 35,000 people. And considering "Midlothian"+"Black Diamond Records" gives ZERO Google results, I doubt you're even notable in your town. -- Kicking222 17:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Completely non-notable record label. Vanity. Only 92 Google hits. The label only releases music by one artist and has no homepage of its own. -- Kicking222 17:59, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.