Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biotronik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (copyvio). Titoxd^(?!?) 00:41, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Biotronik

While this is certainly a major company that would have no problem meeting WP:CORP, this article looks to be nothing but the company's own PR brochure. I can't find a clear enough source on the web to do a copyvio, though. Therefore, I'm putting it here. Pat Payne 22:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Looks to have come in parts from [1] which is copyrighted. Don't want to stamp on the AFD with a copyvio though,so I'll leave it up to you. Also it had only been up for ten minutes when you AFDed so perhaps the creator was working on it? Yomangani 23:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Comment If you'd like to put a copyvio on it, I don't mind. I don't think the author was working on it as such, because it looked like his entire act (as far as I could see) was to post the brochure as is. Pat Payne 00:43, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I've listed it as copyvio and left the AFD notice (as copyvio is backlogged we'll see who gets it first). Yomangani 00:52, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 17:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as copyvio. Molerat 16:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.