Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bianry

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 03:02, Jan 16, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bianry

Typo, is this mergeable anywhere? I suspect we've got this covered already. --fvw* 21:36, 2005 Jan 1 (UTC)

• Different meanings of binary and aspects of the binary numeral system as well as binary data are throughly covered in various articles. Delete. Phils 21:45, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Binary numeral system has all the content of this article and more, so it does not need to be merged. - Marcika 22:17, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, content already exists elsewhere. Rje 01:20, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, and optionally redirect. Gazpacho 01:21, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, to Binary numeral system. Megan1967 03:42, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • I don't think it counts as a common misspelling does it? A common typo perhaps, but no more common than any other transposition. --fvw* 03:45, 2005 Jan 2 (UTC)
• Delete, content elsewhere, and I don't think a redirect is called for (although I wouldn't object to something that harmless). Ливай | ☺ 05:17, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as an obvious, well-intentioned user mistake. Wyss 04:19, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.