Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Sholom Day Camp (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:08, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Beth Sholom Day Camp
- Merge Above Jewish camps or create new article emcompassing all. Librarianofages 02:55, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Its a summer camp. The current incarnation of the article consists of a declaration of the broad type of the camp, then a listing of the facilities, most if not all of which I assume to be universal to holiday recreational camps worldwide. Unless the article can explain, through the use of verifiable information taken from reliable third-party sources, how this summer camp is significantly different from the standard, run of the mill summer camp, there is nothing we can do that the camp's own website cannot do better. -- saberwyn 10:59, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, does not establish notability. Or merge into article that covers all camps, ect.--Tom 13:22, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Saberwyn. Páll (Die pienk olifant) 13:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or merge to Roslyn Heights, New York where it's located, and as suggested on the article's page. IZAK 14:39, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, since there are no guidelines for summer camps, I simply don't see anything that distinguishes this particular summer camp.--Isotope23 17:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable and nowhere to merge. Ted 01:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- I already voted to keep this before, I vote so again -- thank you, DR., for wasting my time by making me do this over and over... Rooster613rooster613Rooster613 01:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment if it is such a waste of your time, then don't bother rendering an opinion.--Isotope23 12:18, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.